Clearly, Judge Pickering is no anti-corporate liberal loon. What does he think of ERISA? Here’s what he had to say in 1994:
There has not been a single case that has been filed before this Court by an employee coming into federal court saying, "I want to protect my pension or my benefits under the broad terms of ERISA." Every single case brought before this Court has involved insurance companies using ERISA as a shield to prevent employees from having the legal redress and remedies they would have had under long-standing state laws existing before the adoption of ERISA. It is indeed an anomaly that an act passed for the security of the employees should be used almost exclusively to defeat their security and leave them without remedies for fraud and overreaching conduct.
The case was Suggs v. Pan American Life Ins. Co., and the citation is 847 F.Supp. 1324 (S.D.Miss. 1994).
No comments:
Post a Comment